Friday, February 28, 2020
Thursday, February 27, 2020
Thursday Thoughts - February 27
Many Christians rant and rave about the dangers and failures of science and philosophy, but their soft-headed and hard-hearted theology is doing more damage in promoting blindness, than many a scientific or philosophical orientation ever could.
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Living Spiritual Rhythms - February 26
As I repeatedly underscored in my book on Ricoeur and biblical hermeneutics, reductionism is, and rightly so, faltering. While reductionism has been and still is popular, a transdisciplinary path, though more arduous, is gradually replacing it. Transdisciplinarity (being open to a suite of disciplines that can impact, even transform each other) is indeed becoming recognized as necessary when investigating issues like self, God, other, or more specifically anthropology, theology, genetics, and biology. Being as well informed as possible in several disciplines is a new spiritual challenge, though of course one cannot be a specialist to the same degree in each one. Learning from one another’s expertise is also essential. Thus, I’d wager the playing surface is now being enlarged and extensive templates are becoming available for more productive transdisciplinary research in a diversity of fields.
Thursday, February 20, 2020
Thursday Thoughts - February 20
Wednesday, February 19, 2020
Living Spiritual Rhythms - February 19
Monday, February 17, 2020
Reflection for the Week - February 17
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Thursday Thoughts - February 13
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
Living Spiritual Rhythms - February 12
Imagination expands our lives and has the capacity to connect us with the real. It helps us to understand God, the world, the other, and ourselves. No doubt within much of the Christian tradition a fear of imagining wrong things has led to smothering and sedating imagination. Marginalized artists, poets, story tellers, and musicians, who have been forced to the edges of their churches or completely out of them, deserve more. So many have been scolded and told – it’s all about following the rules and regulations, get in line, conform to the status quo, as if creativity and imagination are somehow always connected to the unreal. I’d wager quite the opposite is the case.
Monday, February 10, 2020
Reflection for the Week - February 10
In Science & Theology discussions, especially among theists and Christians, the question is often posed: Was Paul right or wrong about his views of an historical Adam & Eve? Perhaps, to frame the question this way is not the best way of approaching it. It looks to me like Paul appeals to the OT and tradition out of his Jewish/Greco-Roman perspective. There seems little doubt he would have believed in a historical Adam & Eve, but since he would have had no other option, he therefore can’t be right or wrong. He worked with what he had and with what was being revealed. When it comes to human origins, cosmology, and the theology connected to them, Paul writes as an authoritative apostle and communicates what he could about these matters. Yet, because of a lack of information (not the case for his encounter with the Risen One, though this was still somewhat opaque according to one narrator; three conversion stories in Acts) on any alternative for origins or cosmology and their theological implications, Paul has to be understood within the limits of his historical and cultural context on such issues. I’d wager he can be more and less influenced by this context, depending on the matter at hand. Paul is therefore not right or wrong regarding his views of Adam & Eve. He is the ‘more’ contextually influenced Paul on these matters and as such, right or wrong is a category mistake. Thus, it is no longer an option, but now an obligation to try to sort out the varying degrees of context and the role they played in Paul’s writings, and then to try to work other things out from there.
Thursday, February 6, 2020
Thursday Thoughts - February 6
We’re hard pressed to paint a definitive picture
of God, but instead of being disappointed about this, we should embrace the
privilege of unknowing. In this case, there just might be a need to exchange
idealism for realism – a hermeneutical realism, when it comes to knowing God.
Not only, for example, does God have numerous names, but God is also referred
to in a multitude of ways in the biblical text. There’s a real diversity of theological
representations here that don’t settle into a nice comfortable package. Debate
then as to who God is happens in the text itself. Further, as we explore the
natural world, we continue to be amazed by its seemingly unending magnitude and
its delicate fragility. This raises plenty of theological possibilities,
leaving us in a position of having to wait and see. Thus, whether we delve into
the biblical text or plumb the depths of nature, I’d wager God is indeed a
mysterious character.
Wednesday, February 5, 2020
Living Spiritual Rhythms - February 5
Monday, February 3, 2020
Reflection for the Week - February 3
Our destiny is moving towards a ‘transformed’ future, not a recovery of an illusory paradisiacal past. This means we are continuously finding our way along in the magnificent adventure of exploring and embracing the symbols, metaphors, and narratives about God and life in the cosmos.