There
have been many previously and even more presently that refer to the notion of
Divine revelation in a book like the biblical text. In thinking this over, and
over, and over for a long time, I’m still not sure what such an appeal means.
Is it like – this is a book dropped from heaven? Or, a book written by the pen
of God? Scholars and non-scholars alike stake out this type of claim as if – “well,
this text is Divine revelation and therefore it settles it all – my position is
the correct one and if you don’t agree with me then you don’t believe in Divine
revelation.” I’m perplexed by what seems a sort of generic sleight of hand
apologetic that supposedly explains everything according to one’s own
preferences and everyone else somehow has it wrong. Not only is this arrogant,
but the way it’s used by the supposed “religious elite” is a downright scandal.
Granted, such an uninformed and damaging perspective can be set aside. Divine
revelation is not whatever we’d make it be. For me, however, the lack of clarity
about what it is remains. I’d wager that a “booking” of Divine revelation is
rather a murky concept and thus is one major area, among others in Christian
circles, that needs much more careful work and (re)formulation.
Monday, January 16, 2017
Reflection for the Week - January 16
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment